← back to Book reviews
Peak - by Anders Ericsson, Robert Pool, 2016

The main problem/question posed by the book:
- How do people become expert performers?
- Can we learn from expert performers how to improve our skills?
The main takeaways:
- We are all born with a gift: the adaptability of our mind and body
- The body's and the mind's adaptability outweights any genetic differences that may give some people advantage in the beginning
- There is no such thing as innate talent, no shortcuts, only hard work - all top performers did years of sustained practice
- With deliberate practice the average person can improve greatly (number recall experiment)
Other interesing ideas
Regular practice vs Deliberate practice
- pushing the boundaries (outside of comfort zone)
- fully focused on goal
- quick feedback
- identify weakness and fix it
Recepie - 3Fs - Focus, Feedback, Fixit:
- Break the skill down into components, that you can do repeatadly and analyze effectively
- Determine your weaknesses and figure out how to address them
Musical student who used deliberate practice, became more successful because they:
- identify errors better - apply practice better
- better able to determine when they made mistakes
- better able to identify difficult sections, that need more practice
- better mental representations = better skills
The importance of Mental Representations
- meaning - preexisting mental represantations - it aids memory (random words are harder to remember then a sentence)
- preexisting patters of information, held in long-term memory - allows to process great amount of information quickly
- conceptial structure desinged to side step the limitations of the short-term memory imposes on mental processes (7-9 numbers vs 100 numbers recalled)
- infomration organized in a superior way
Innate abilities like IQ, memory, processing speed only affect the performance significantly whan you are a beginner or learning a new skill
- amongs professional performers, performance correlates with practice/training time not IQ or other innate ability (chess players)
- the body's and the mind's adaptability outweights any genetic differences that may give some people advantage in the beginning
Knowledge vs Skill
- knowledge is needed, what you know?
- facts, concepts, rules - that are stored as individual pieces of information in long term memory, unconnected - limited use
- skill is useful, what you can do?
- the pieces are part of an interconnected pattern of mental representations aimed at doing someting - it is easier to use
- deliberate practice is all about skill, and you pick up the knowledge along the way
Simple writing = knowledge telling
Expert writing = knowledge transofrm, the process of writing adds to/changes the knowledge the writer had at the beginning
Homo Sapiens = "Knowing Man", this should be updated to "Practicing Man"